Jansch wrote it in the mid-late fifties (one could check in a discography, but I'm on a short fuse – preparing for the WCS tour starting tomorrow); the reference to the OAS suggests it was some time between 1954 and 1962.The cars won't stop for no-one
They don't think you're just a rollin' bum
They think you're an OAS spy
Gonna shoot them as they go by
No the cars won't stop, won't stop for no-one
But that 'OAS' has gone the way of much local colour. Do a Google search for They think you're an OAS spy, Jansch and you get 'about 4,650' results‘; search for They think that you're a spy, Jansch and you get 'about 50,800' – almost 11 times as many††.
I enjoy such quirkiness. The Guys and Dolls score is peppered with bits of local colour: 'Take back your mink,' sings Adelaide, 'And go Hollanderize it for somebody else.' A guy in the Fugue for Tin Horns 'reeks of Vitalis and Barbasol'.
But references to context-specific things like this seldom survive for long. Though I have heard Bert Jansch more than once, I never heard him sing Strollin' down the highway but it wouldn't surprise me at all if he himself suppressed the 'OAS' reference in later covers. And sometimes it's the fault of the censors. [2018 clarification: In West Side Story] Anita's
in the Broadway show became the rather wimpish '...Poor dear/..../So long as he's here' for the film (or maybe before that, for the original cast recording).He'll come home hot and tired
No matter if he's tired
So long as he's hot
OK, that's not a trade name. but it's similar in that it's Bowdlerized. This often happens with film musicals. In Easter Parade,
becomes the rather insipid '...And then you'll be seen in the smart magazines', because some spineless backer† wondered whether people would need an explanation of Rotogravure without a footnote. DUH! Long live footnotes – life's full of the things.On the Avenue, Fifth Avenue
The photographers will snap us
And you'll find that you're in Rotogravure
And while we're on the subject of musicals, and changes made by spineless backers, in the early 1940s Lorenz Hart wrote
We'll have Manhattan
the Bronx and Staten Island too...
And South Pacific
Is a terrific show they say...
with that brilliant internal rhyme. Cue the spineless backer about ten years later: 'But that's so Last Decade. We need to mention some more recent show.'
So was born the insipid
And My Fair Lady
They say is a terrific show
(in which the word 'terrific' is a sad fossil, giving a clue to the original rhyme-scheme.)
</afterthought>But there's packing to be done. I'll be writing again next week. And in the meantime you can – if you get a wiggle on – download the freeby (and get reviewing, perhaps...?) [2018 update: A bit late for this!😕]
†PS 'spineless backers' – I wonder if the oxymoron was entirely accidental or whether a subconscious jester was at work.
PPS I've just thought of another example, from the António Carlos Jobim song Desafinado. [I don't know what happens to it in the 'translation', but as even the title is wrong (off-key doesn't mean out of tune) I doubt it]‡:
‡PPS Oh Lor'. The good news is that it has kept the Rolleiflex. The bad news is that it has introduced an irrelevant bit of cleverness:Fotografei você na minha Rolleiflex
Revelou-se a sua enorme ingratidão
Why can't translators just GET OUT OF THE FRIGGING WAY ?I took your picture with my trusty Rolleiflex
And now all I have developed is a complex
<afterthought>Update 2013.09.15.17:50 – added this PPPS:
The original, after that 'Rolleiflex' line, has Revelou-se a sua enorme ingratidão. I wonder if in Jobim's mind there was the idea of developing a photograph – in a tray of whatever chemicals they use – with the image in the photograph slowly revelando-se. I'm not sure if the Portuguese would accommodate this nuance. If so – accidentally, I'm sure – the translator stumbled on a deeper truth. The enorme ingratidão became apparent slowly but surely, like a developing photograph.
I don't have an intimate knowledge of Google's search algorithms, but I suspect the larger number includes all the hits noted for the smaller number. But even allowing for this double-counting, the version without OAS is about 10 times as common.
Update 2018.04.06.11:30 – Various format tweaks and temporal clarifications.